• Adam China-Hills

CV-19 Truth. Facts Not Fear...

Updated: Nov 18, 2020

“You can fool some of the people some of the time,

but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”

Bob Marley

Are you an intelligent person? Are you capable of critical thinking? If so, this little leaflet invites you - with a free mind - to question current affairs and dispassionately research the subjects of contagion, vaccination and corruption.

“All great truths begin as blasphemies.”

George Bernard Shaw

Imagine an invisible, psychological battle based solely on information - this is the nature of 21st century warfare. Our thoughts, feelings and actions are all largely based on information. And subsequently, without free thought, to control this information is to significantly control the minds of the people who consume it.

"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating

the oppressed, and loving the oppressors."

Malcolm X

So if you'd like to understand the true nature of current affairs you must apply independent thinking and an unbiased mind. Approaching any topic or debate with a belief to defend will only lead to self-censorship, confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance and argument.

Thousands, we’re told, are catching a ‘new, deadly virus’. But the science and statistics simply don’t support this unfounded claim. A quick glance at the UK, ONS overall fatalities for 2020, reveals that - against a five year average - weekly deaths only increased during lockdown between weeks 13-21 (23/03 - 24/05).

Would a ‘new, deadly virus’ restrict its victims to the time frame of a national lockdown? Or does this clear cut, fatal correlation simply speak for itself? The data plainly reveals the devastating effect of prioritising, even restricting, national healthcare to select patients only. Understandably, if we stop treating fatally sick patients, they will likely die. Critically ill, elderly people were evacuated from hospitals and abandoned in care homes no longer tended to by doctors. Cancer patients were on hold and seizures, strokes and heart attacks were sidelined whilst suicide soared for a global population under effective house arrest. The blanket issuing of DNR’s - do not resuscitate forms - only increased the death toll.

“Unthinking respect for authority

is the greatest enemy of truth.”


The inventor of the RT-PCR test - Kary Mullis - the package insert and the U.S Centre for Disease Control (CDC), all openly state that positive results ‘do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses’. In using such a generic test it is perfectly possible to mistakenly attribute virtually any illness to an alleged ‘new, deadly virus.’

Each year, millions of people experience toxin induced respiratory illnesses like the common cold. Whilst influenza and pneumonia kill thousands of all ages. Given the apparent, recent reduction of these cases and a simultaneous spike in ‘cv-19’, could this redesignation of disease be more clear? Bizarre policies in government further facilitated the redesignation of any death that occurred within 28 days of testing positive:

"There is no change in the definition used to report deaths of COVID-19, which is defined as an individual who has died and has had a laboratory confirmed report of covid-19 in the 28 days prior to death."

The nature of such a death, therefore, is irrelevant according to this system. Heart attack, cancer or car crash, in event of a recent positive test, it's all ‘covid-19’.

Other, more prophetic bills and illegally passed policies were equally outrageous. Bill H.R.748, the 'COVID-19 CARES ACT' for example, was introduced to the U.S. congress an entire year before the initial outbreak on 24/01/19. The U.S government, however, wasn't the only institution that saw this coming. In hosting Event 201, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, along with Johns Hopkins University and the World Economic Forum, ran a mysteriously uncanny simulation of a coronavirus pandemic on 18/10/19 - six weeks before patient zero. Further back still, the 2017 advent of the trump administration saw Anthony Fauci give an impeccably prescient speech, in which he stated:

"There is no question of a surprise outbreak,

the one thing we know for sure, is that

this will occur in the next few years."

Anthony Fauci

But the more you research the stranger this becomes. Afterall, where is this new, deadly virus? Has anyone seen it? The scientific, gold standard for proving the existence of a contagion is known as Koch’s postulates. There are four:

1. Identify a microorganism in unhealthy patients that isn’t present within healthy people.

2. Isolate the microorganism and grow it in pure culture.

3. Inoculate a healthy host with the supposed causative agent and observe the same illness.

4. Re-isolate the microorganism to finally prove that it caused the disease.

None of these postulates were met for the alleged discovery of SARS-CoV-2. In fact, you may be surprised to learn that none of these postulates have ever been met for any so-called ‘virus’.

This is simply due to the fact that our entire virological worldview is incorrect. As Dr. Stefan Lanka points out in his paper ‘The Misconception Called Virus’, John Franklin Enders - the frequently cited father of virology - along with all subsequent virologists have failed to use basic negative controls in their alleged ‘infectious’ experiments.

To rule out bacterial infection, sample tissue is bombarded with antibiotics in preparation for the so-called ‘infected’ fluid. Nutrients are also withdrawn to supposedly make it ‘hungrier for the virus’. The sample is eventually exposed to the ‘infected’ fluid and deathly effects are observed.

However, as Dr. Lanka has invariably now shown, through the simple inclusion of a negative control, the ill-effects of this experiment - with or without the ‘virus’ - are identical. The toxic preparation of the sample tissue is the cause of the so-called ‘infectious’ effect.

“There is no pathogenic virus.”

Dr. Stefan Lanka

So what is a ‘virus’? We’ve certainly seen electron photographs of select genetic material, but what are we actually looking at?

Through the normalisation of pollution, caffeine, alcohol and denatured junk food, our bodies often work overtime to expel the toxins we consume. To achieve this, cellular organelles (lysosomes) instruct toxic cells to decompose and recycle for the logistics of restoring health.

In this process, endosomes - tiny little vesicles containing broken, base pair fragments of our own DNA/RNA - are induced. These endosomes - conceived within our own cells - are then relabelled ‘exosomes’ on leaving their native cell membrane. It is here where they’re mistaken and falsely framed as foreign, ‘viral’ invaders of the body.

“A virus is simply the excretion of a toxic cell.”

Rudolf Steiner

But to qualify the false notion of an invading, animate microorganism, ‘virologists’ need a full end-to-end genome. So to make ends meet, they hypothetically connect such fragments of our genetic material to form the rather scary, spiky but totally conceptual and imaginary ‘virus’ CGI models, with which we’re now so familiar.

The electron photographs of what we call ‘viral’ genetic material actually depict the result of illness and not the cause of disease. It is for this reason, alone, that no ‘virus’ has ever passed Koch’s postulates.

“A virus is an exosome in every possible way.”

Dr. James Hildreth

Sure, no one wants to be sneezed over all day, but it’s important to understand that this will only incrementally add to our pre-existing level of toxicity - just as the wintry, ill-effects of the cold are contingent upon exposure and health. No illness is the result of a lively pathogenic ‘virus’ lurking on objects and the very air we breathe.

This makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Afterall, where do 'viruses' actually come from? For example, imagine a lake full of dead fish, would you think that: a.) These deaths were caused by a deadly ‘virus’ passing from host to host? Or, b.) The water is toxic?

Bad skin, a runny nose, coughing and sneezing are just some of the symptoms involved in detoxifying the body. We simply don’t need ‘viruses’ to explain the ill-effects of toxins. It is toxins, not ‘viruses’, that form the primary cause of the effects we falsely attribute to SARS, HIV, HPC, H5N1, H1N1 and a seemingly endless array of ‘deadly pathogens’. The infamous black death, scurvy, tuberculosis and cholera - which arise from unsanitary, toxic conditions - are just some of the diseases that narrowly escaped our widespread viral myth.

Today, with common phrases like 'Monday blues’ and ‘TGI Friday', our weekly, indentured servitude and lack of true freedom leads directly to the anxiety, depression and routine substance abuse that further weakens immunity. But an organic, clean diet, abstinence from toxins and basic self-care is sufficient in building immunity against any so-called ‘infectious’ disease. Although stress, pollution and other environmental toxins are difficult to avoid, we are significantly responsible for our health.

The false science of contagion stands head and shoulders above all ‘covid’ stats. For our case/death rates are all analysing a fundamentally fraudulent medical paradigm and deeply ingrained misconception.

So what of the Wuhan lab leak theory? Well, the creation of a deadly poison does not validate the concept of contagion. From proximity, exposure and immunity to hygiene, nutrition and basic social etiquette, what chance does a ‘virus’ (Latin: poison, slime, venom) have in spreading to its second host, let alone circumnavigating the entire globe infecting billions in its wake? This narrative, however, does form a very convenient scapegoat for staging a new cold war with China - divide and rule.

“All truth passes through three stages; first, it is ridiculed;

second, it is violently opposed; and third,

it is accepted as self-evident.”

Arthur Schopenhauer

In reality there are no pathogenic ‘viruses’. So aside from the junk food, binge drinking, air pollution and old age that all eventually render us susceptible to flu-like symptoms, what else could be sickening us at this time? Through anecdotal evidence, we certainly seem to be suffering an epidemic, of sorts, but if it's not the result of a ‘deadly virus’ then what is it?

Firstly we must appreciate the power of the mind. If we have mild, cold-like symptoms but are conversely informed that we may have a life threatening disease, we may be forgiven for exhibiting a shortness of breath. The all encompassing fear of death alone, is surely enough to transform the mildest of ailments into a cortisol induced, chemical poison of sorts - a deadly, psychosomatic blend of hypochondria, paranoia, panic, anxiety and stress - all of which weaken the immune system.

But psychosomatics aside, in the field of electro-magnetic radiation, there is a certain technology we may be wise to question. In the year 1916 the arrival of radio waves was shortly followed by the 'Spanish flu'. In 2003 we saw the rollout of 3G technology and 'SARS-CoV-1'. Six years later in 2009, 4G technology arrived alongside the 'H1N1' epidemic. But most recently, we observed the installation of 5G towers throughout a lockdown supposedly caused by the alleged 'SARS-CoV-2' pandemic. Can this century long, routine correlation really be a coincidence? Or are these ‘viral’ epidemics simply cover for the physiological effects of acclimatising to higher frequency, electro-smog radiation?

Of course the idea that radiation can cause a ‘virus' sounds ludicrous to the uninformed, but once you've discovered their true nature - excretions of toxic cells - it makes perfect sense.

Strangely, there’s very few independent studies on the effects of this technology, and once conducted, they're curiously retracted. In fact, in sanctioning anyone who dares broach the topic, Ofcom have effectively banned all British broadcasters from discussing any possible relationship between radiation and flu-like symptoms. At the same time, on the other side of the Atlantic, YouTube is promptly deleting similar content. Reminder - Fascism: a form of far-right government characterised by dictatorial power and forcible suppression of opposition.

The truth about contagion is the foundation for understanding why no evidence exists, whatsoever, for the effectiveness of vaccination. You may be shocked to learn that vaccines have never been tested and are not subject to FDA placebo/double blind studies. This scandalous evasion is granted through the legal denomination ‘biologic’ and not medicine.

The 20th century decline of measles, smallpox, polio and whooping cough is often attributed to vaccination. But these vaccines were created long after the diseases declined. Further still, cholera, tuberculosis, scurvy and scarlet fever all declined at precisely the same time, for which today, there remains no vaccine.

These declines were simply the result of implementing widespread poverty programmes throughout impoverished areas of the US. Nutrition, sanitation, hygiene, waste disposal and general infrastructural advancement all contributed to the U.S CDC’s unanimous conclusion on the matter: “Thus vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the twentieth century.”

Unfortunately, scientific evidence conversely supports the truth that vaccines are only harmful or inert at best. There are hundreds of papers revealing that vaccinated children are, in fact, less healthy than unvaccinated children. This is hardly surprising when you learn what they contain. Most vaccines include bovine fetal serum and aborted human fetal serum - to induce exosomes/small fragments of ‘viral’ RNA - formaldehyde - a known carcinogen - and a toxic blend of heavy metals including mercury and aluminium.

Perhaps this is why an entire list of chronic, neurodevelopmental, auto-immune illnesses became epidemic following the US vaccine schedule amendment of 1989. Mandating an additional 54 doses, ill-effects like SIDS, autism (ASD), ADD, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia were just 5 of 420 diseases that spiked following this amendment.

These illnesses are all listed as ‘side-effects’ on various vaccine package inserts - which we never see. The DTP vaccine has actually been banned in the US but, alas, it’s still administered, to this day, to African children regardless.

In the 1960's the vaccine industry was worth $287 million, today it's worth $60 billion. The four big pharma giants responsible for these vaccines - Sanofi, Merck, Glaxo and Pfizer - are all convicted felons who further profit from the drugs they create to treat vaccine injuries: Adderall, Ritalin, Concerta etc.

Through fraud, defraud, bribery, falsifying science, blackmailing doctors and lying to regulators, they’ve collectively paid $35 billion in damages and penalties over the past ten years alone. Would you put your health in the hands of known criminals?

To make matters worse, the regulators responsible for protecting our children against bad products are in bed with the manufacturers. The European Health Agency and the Food and Drug Administration even sell the vaccines they’re meant to regulate. Both acquire 50% of their budget from pharmaceutical companies.

But if this sinister reality is, in fact, true, why do we never hear about it? Why are we so unquestionably supportive of vaccines? Although the vaccine act legally enforces honesty on product inserts, it does not ensure honesty anywhere else...

Rupert Murdoch has partnerships with Glaxo and owns one of the largest vaccine companies. Anderson Cooper (CNN) is sponsored by Pfizer. Erin Burnett (CNN) is sponsored by Pfizer. NBC nightly news is sponsored by Merck. This is likely all you need to know.

The more we poison ourselves with toxins, the more antibodies we defensively produce and an immunity, of sorts, may subsequently be built against such toxins. This is why lager louts can 'hammer' ten pints on a Saturday night but 'lightweights' head straight to hospital after just one or two.

But to apply the same logic and to purposefully inject ourselves with ‘viruses’ - supposedly ‘tricking’ the immune system into quietly dealing with the ones we haven’t had - is fallacious and foolish based on the fact that no pathogenic ‘virus’ has ever been proven to exist. Sure, exposure to, or consumption of toxins - through injection or alcohol - will understandably yield an immune response, but that is all. Many receive vaccines and yet still 'catch' the 'infections' for which they’re allegedly immunised. Now you know why.

Our insurance led, fear-based model of vaccination has unsuccessfully and dishonestly attempted to treat the effects of illness, forever misunderstanding the cause of disease. This is, in part, why Dr. Stefan Lanka and an increasing number of healthcare professionals are pushing for a long overdue, reform in allopathic, palliative, western healthcare.

The vaccine orthodoxy relies not upon science but on a global, cult-like belief. In accepting authority on blind faith alone, our minds have been placed in a false medical paradigm, conditioned to fear a multitude of 'viruses' - seemingly increasing by the year - each of which conveniently pairs with a profitable vaccine.

In reality, however, this is solely scandalous marketing used to maintain the false notion of contagion - a re-branding of our own genetic material for profit and nefarious, political purposes.

“The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants.”

Albert Camus

So what on earth is happening? To understand, we must accept the true nature of our political landscape. When we think of government, we tend to think of elected politicians, ministers, civil servants etc. We tend to think of 'here today, gone tomorrow' politicians at the helm of disparate, national hierarchies. But today, is this really where the power is or does parliament simply now set the stage for an ongoing, olde-worlde pantomime? Bread and circuses - an entertaining but entirely distracting charade.

“The less power you have, the more you try to exaggerate it.

The more power you have, the more you try to conceal it.”

Yuval Noah Harari

Real power surely lies in the ability to influence and mould human perception. With such powers, news alone can effortlessly amend the thoughts, feelings and subsequent actions of entire populations to align with the will of perceived authority. Historically, however, without the bells and whistles of modern, digital communication, manipulating the mass mindset wasn't so easy and war was the only way.

“Power is in tearing human minds to pieces

and putting them together again in

new shapes of your own choosing.”

George Orwell

From Julius Caesar to Ghengis Khan, dictators have long sought to control the masses. And in the twentieth century, through Mao, Stalin and Hitler, the goal of global domination reigned. But the largest empire of all was a little closer to home…

Today, through the United Nations and the rise of modern democracy, we tend to feel this despotic goal has all but vanished. But through the increasing powers of global banking cartels, multinational corporations and a ruthless US military industrial complex, is it not time to question what we’re really united for - world peace or world fascism?

These days, of course, you won’t get away with such overt brutality. So how might a similar society be conceived today? That’s easy, simply claim that it's for our protection:

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervour. And when the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry.

Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar."

The nature of our alleged enemy is entirely irrelevant. It could be an 'evil foreign force' with ‘weapons of mass destruction’ or an entirely hypothetical, invisible but 'deadly' pathogen. So long as fear is induced upon the population and a false premise for protection is built, people will acquiesce, even enthusiastically support the imposed draconian measures. This psychological manipulation is frequently used and well documented:

"Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it's the leaders of a country that determine the policy. And it's always a simple matter to drag people along whether it's a democracy, a parliament, a fascist or communist dictatorship.

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."

Hermann Goering, Hitler's Reich-Marshall at the Nuremberg Trials.

Known as a 'Hegelian dialectic', this covert technique works simply by falsely fabricating threats to incite the inevitable response that 'something must be done!'. Widespread approval is now granted for the controversial agenda (lockdowns, monopoly, masks, social distancing, vaccines, profit) planned from the outset - problem, reaction, solution.